Skip to content
In what way is our church “the true church?”

Bill Turnbull

The assertion made in D&C 1:30 that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is “the only true and living church on the face of the whole earth with which I, the Lord, am well pleased” is a classic two-edge sword.

A good many devout saints reaffirm the “only true church” claim regularly in  testimony. They find the idea exciting, empowering and deeply true.  It adds great vitality and meaning to their faith.

For other members the claim strikes an exclusive tone. Plus, it seems inconsistent with their observation and experience of the broader world. To many younger members especially, the “only true church” narrative feels  deeply uncomfortable. Surveys show it as a principal cause of many young members’ disaffection with the church. It seems to imply that God is not doing important work elsewhere in the world and among other faith traditions. It seems to make God too small.

Not surprisingly, many outside the church hear the claim as exclusive and divisive.  But most are probably just indifferent. People aren’t asking “Which church is true?” much these days. More commonly they are asking “Why church?”

Maybe whether or not we are the “true church” isn’t the most important question. Maybe the question we should be asking is:  How can we 1) confidently affirm our church’s unique calling and offer its unique gifts to God’s children while 2)  affirming and embracing all the other diverse and important ways the Lord is working in the world?

So let’s unpack and examine D&C 1:30, the passage that seems to hold the power both to inspire and to vex readers. We have brought together a brilliant team to take up the question.

First, we invited one of our advisory board members, Philip Barlow, to give us his perspective. In his deep dive into the subject, he starts by sketching out some of the problems that attach to the “only true church” narrative, and then suggests a productive path forward. You can read it here. Dr. Barlow is the former Leonard Arrington Chair of Mormon History and Culture at Utah State University and is currently Associate Director of the Neal A. Maxwell Institute at BYU,

Patrick Mason, who currently holds the Arrington Chair at USU, also weighs in on the question in a wonderful essay, which will actually become a chapter in an important new book he is writing for Faith Matters. Patrick also sat down for a conversation on the issue with our Faith Matters Podcast hosts. You can watch or listen here.

The late Eugene England, a popular professor of literature at BYU and a prolific writer, wrote a classic essay on this question that he titled “Why the Church is as True as the Gospel.” It’s been appreciated by many thoughtful saints over the years and well worth a read.

Another of our advisory board members, Melissa Inouye, a professor of Chinese Studies who is currently working for the Church History Department, addressed this subject in a fun and creative way at a Faith Matters gathering in January 2020. You can watch the video here.

Share on

Additional Resources

No data was found

More Questions

How do we reconcile Book of Mormon “problems” with the claim that it is the “most correct” scriptural text? And is it essential that we see the Book of Mormon as truly historical—i.e. written by ancient writers about an ancient people? Could it be some other form of writing—inspired or otherwise?
How can I make sense of our history of denying priesthood and temple blessings to our Black brothers and sisters?
Our history with plural marriage is really hard to accept. Shouldn’t we just renounce it in past, present and future and move on?
Are there big problems with the Book of Abraham?
Is there conflict between Latter-day Saint theology and evolution?
I feel like I need to incorporate mindfulness in my life. Can our faith embrace and teach practices like meditation or contemplative prayer?